save_asset
Save an Unreal Engine asset to disk by specifying its asset path.
Instructions
Save a single asset to disk.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| asset_path | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Save an Unreal Engine asset to disk by specifying its asset path.
Save a single asset to disk.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| asset_path | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description only says 'save to disk'. Lacks disclosure of side effects, permission requirements, or overwrite behavior. The description should provide more behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise, but it lacks structure and detail. Every word earns its place, but more depth is needed for a minimal viable description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has one parameter and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain the parameter, output, or use cases, leading to gaps for an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the asset_path parameter. No additional meaning is provided beyond the schema type.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool saves an asset to disk, differentiating from siblings like save_all and save_current_level. However, it doesn't specify the asset type or format.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Siblings include save_all and save_current_level, but the description provides no context for choosing save_asset.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/elemenopyunome/unreal-engine-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server