Skip to main content
Glama

Promotion: order status

promotion_get_order_status_v1
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check the status of a BBIP promotion order by its ID. Returns overall status, total price, and per-item details to track order execution.

Instructions

Returns the status of a BBIP order by its orderId: the order's overall status (initialized/waiting/in_process/processed), totalPrice (kopecks) and a per-item status for each listing (slug, price, errorReason). READ-ONLY: spends NO money. Call it AFTER promotion_create_bbip_order_for_items_v1 to track the order's execution.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
orderIdYesPromotion order identifier in UUID format, obtained from promotion_create_bbip_order_for_items_v1.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint. Description reinforces 'READ-ONLY: spends NO money' and details return structure, adding valid context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first defines purpose and output, second adds safety and usage guidance. No redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only status check with one parameter and rich annotations, the description covers purpose, usage, and output. Lacks error handling details, but overall is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and parameter description already states the source (obtained from creation tool). Description adds no further parameter details beyond what schema provides, meeting baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns the status of a BBIP order, specifying exact fields (overall status, totalPrice, per-item status). It distinguishes from sibling tools like promotion_create_bbip_order_for_items_v1 by noting it is for tracking execution after creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent to call it AFTER promotion_create_bbip_order_for_items_v1, providing clear sequencing. Also labels it as READ-ONLY, guiding when it is safe to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/elchin92/avito-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server