⚠️ Автозагрузка: запустить выгрузку

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, aligning with the description's claim that it starts a process (a write, non-destructive action). The description adds the hourly limit but omits details about idempotency, error handling, or side effects beyond starting the process. Overall, it provides moderate transparency beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, front-loading the action and adding the crucial limit. Every sentence serves a purpose—no wasted words. The warning emoji in the title is a minor enhancer but does not detract from conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not explain the return value or outcome of calling the tool, which is important since there is no output schema. It also omits prerequisites (e.g., profile must have a URL set) and error conditions. Given the tool's complexity (triggers a background process), the description is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions for dryRun and idempotencyKey. The description adds minimal value beyond noting that parameters are optional. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate since the schema already fully documents parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool starts the autoload process for ads from a file URL defined in profile settings. The verb 'ЗАПУСКАЕТ' (starts) and resource 'автозагрузка объявлений' (autoload of ads) are specific, distinguishing it from sibling tools that handle reports, profiles, or other operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions a limit of one upload per hour, providing a clear usage constraint. It also states that no parameters are required, reducing cognitive load. However, it does not explicitly compare to sibling tools or provide when-not-to-use scenarios, though the context hints at its unique role.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.