Skip to main content
Glama

Call tracking: list of calls

calltracking_get_calls
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a paginated list of call-tracking calls within a specified time range, filtered by call time in RFC3339 format. Enables analysis of call logs from your Avito account.

Instructions

Returns a list of call-tracking calls over a time range, filtered by call time (callTime), with pagination (read-only). Requires a time window in RFC3339 format. To fetch a single call by id use calltracking_get_call_by_id; for the conversation recording use calltracking_get_record_by_call_id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitYesPage size — how many calls to return per request (the API allows at most 100).
offsetYesPagination offset (the number of records to skip from the start, starting at 0).
dateTimeToNoEnd of the search range by callTime (RFC3339, e.g. "2021-03-02T23:59:59Z"). If omitted, defaults to dateTimeFrom + 1 month; the maximum is dateTimeFrom + 3 months.
dateTimeFromYesStart of the search range by call time (callTime), an RFC3339-formatted string, e.g. "2021-01-02T00:00:00Z". Required.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false. Description adds pagination behavior and time window format requirement, which is useful context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences: first describes function and filters, second adds requirement, third gives alternatives. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description covers key aspects: purpose, filters, pagination, time format, and alternatives. Could mention return fields but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. Description reinforces time window requirement but doesn't add significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it returns a list of call-tracking calls over a time range with pagination. Distinguishes from sibling tools by mentioning alternatives for single call and recording.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use this tool vs alternatives: 'To fetch a single call by id use calltracking_get_call_by_id; for the conversation recording use calltracking_get_record_by_call_id.' Also notes read-only nature.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/elchin92/avito-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server