Доставка: создать анонс [sandbox v1]

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true. The description adds no behavioral context beyond what is already declared, such as the sandbox nature or any side effects. It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it could be improved by front-loading key information. It is not overly verbose, yet it sacrifices completeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 10 parameters (8 required), nested objects, and no output schema, the minimal description fails to address return values, expected behavior, or usage patterns. It is insufficient for an AI agent to confidently invoke the tool without additional external references.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 60%, but the tool description provides no additional meaning for parameters like announcementID, announcementType, and barcode, which lack schema descriptions. The description relies entirely on inline schema descriptions, which are incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Создание тестового анонса' (creating a test announcement), which clearly indicates the verb and resource. It also specifies 'sandbox v1' in both title and description. However, it does not distinguish itself from sibling tools like delivery_sandbox_create_announcement, leaving potential ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings or alternatives. It lacks any mention of scenarios, preconditions, or exclusions, leaving the agent without contextual decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.