Доставка: список СЦ [sandbox]
delivery_get_sorting_centerRetrieve a list of sorting centers for delivery operations.
Instructions
[SANDBOX] Список сортировочных центров.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
delivery_get_sorting_centerRetrieve a list of sorting centers for delivery operations.
[SANDBOX] Список сортировочных центров.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and openWorldHint. The description adds the sandbox context, but no further behavioral traits are disclosed beyond what annotations cover.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no extraneous words. It is front-loaded with [SANDBOX]. It could be slightly more informative but is appropriately concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with no output schema, the description only states it lists sorting centers. It lacks details about return format, contents, or any additional context the agent might need.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter info. Baseline for zero parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states it lists sorting centers, which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like delivery_add_sorting_center which adds centers.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus other delivery tools. The sibling list is large, but no context is provided for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/elchin92/avito-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server