Skip to main content
Glama

⚠️ Заказы: честный знак

orders_markings

Submit DataMatrix codes to mark items in an order. Required for compliance with Russian product marking regulations.

Instructions

⚠️ ПЕРЕДАЁТ "честный знак" (DataMatrix) для маркировки товара в заказе.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
markingsYesМассив записей маркировки. См. swagger Управление заказами.json.
dryRunNov0.7.0: если true — возвращает preview HTTP-запроса без вызова Avito API. Безопасно для просмотра, что именно будет сделано. Default: значение AVITO_MCP_DRY_RUN_DEFAULT (обычно false).
idempotencyKeyNov0.7.0: опциональный ключ для защиты от дублей. Повторный вызов с тем же ключом в течение AVITO_MCP_IDEMPOTENCY_TTL_SEC возвращает закешированный результат. Тот же ключ с другими args вернёт ошибку conflict — это безопасно по дизайну.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate the tool is not readOnly and not destructive, but the description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the existence of dryRun and idempotencyKey parameters. The side effects of transferring markings are not explained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that communicates the core purpose without any unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is very brief and does not explain what 'передаёт' (transfers) means in terms of side effects, return values, or detailed behavior. For a tool with no output schema, more context would be helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, so the parameter semantics are fully captured in the schema. The tool description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool transfers 'честный знак' (DataMatrix) for marking items in an order, using a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools, but no obvious sibling exists for this specific function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention exclusions or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/elchin92/avito-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server