Skip to main content
Glama

Autoload: report list

autoload_get_reports_v2
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get paginated autoload reports filtered by creation date, providing report IDs for subsequent detail retrieval.

Instructions

Returns a list of autoload reports (id, started_at, finished_at, status) with pagination and a filter by creation date. Sorted in descending order: the most recent report first. Read-only; the response contains a meta block with total/pages. Use it to find a report_id, then fetch details via autoload_get_report_by_id_v3 / autoload_get_report_items_by_id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number (integer ≥ 1). Defaults to the first page.
date_toNoFilter by report creation date "to" (inclusive), RFC3339 format, e.g. "2022-05-27T14:48:50.52Z".
per_pageNoNumber of reports per page. Defaults to 50; the API allows up to 200, but it is capped at 100 here.
date_fromNoFilter by report creation date "from" (inclusive), RFC3339 format, e.g. "2022-05-27T14:48:50.52Z".
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description adds behavioral context beyond annotations: explicitly states it is read-only and that the response contains a meta block with total/pages. Annotations already declare safety, and description aligns with them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states functionality and sorting, second provides usage guidance. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 optional parameters and no output schema, description sufficiently explains returned fields, pagination, sorting, and meta block. Complete for its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description mentions pagination and date filter but does not add new semantics beyond schema. No contradictions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it returns a list of autoload reports with specific fields (id, started_at, finished_at, status) and mentions pagination and date filtering. It distinguishes from siblings like autoload_get_report_by_id_v3 by indicating this is for listing and finding report_id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells user to use this tool to find a report_id, then fetch details via autoload_get_report_by_id_v3 or autoload_get_report_items_by_id. Provides clear context on when to use and what to do next.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/elchin92/avito-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server