Skip to main content
Glama
dipseth

google-workspace-unlimited

Delete Calendar Event(s)

delete_event
DestructiveIdempotent

Delete single or multiple Google Calendar events using event IDs. Accepts comma-separated, JSON array, or list formats for batch deletion.

Instructions

Deletes one or more events from Google Calendar. Supports single event ID, comma-separated IDs, JSON array strings, or native list format for batch deletion.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
event_idYesSingle event ID, comma-separated string of IDs (e.g., 'id1,id2,id3'), JSON array string (e.g., '["id1","id2"]'), or list of event IDs
calendar_idNoCalendar ID from which to delete eventsprimary
user_google_emailNoThe user's Google email address for Calendar access. If None, uses the current authenticated user from FastMCP context (auto-injected by middleware).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
messageYes
successYes
userEmailYes
calendarIdYes
eventsFailedYes
eventsDeletedYes
totalProcessedYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. Description adds input format details but does not disclose additional behavioral traits (e.g., handling of recurring events, confirmation prompts, or error states). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with verb and resource. Every word earns its place, no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple deletion tool with good annotations and full schema coverage, description is adequate. Could mention return value or behavior for invalid IDs, but output schema exists to fill gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema provides full descriptions for all three parameters (100% coverage). Tool description summarizes input formats for event_id but does not add new meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb ('deletes') and resource ('one or more events from Google Calendar'). It specifies multiple input formats for event IDs, distinguishing it from similar tools like create_event, modify_event, or bulk_calendar_operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage for deletion but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus siblings like modify_event or bulk_calendar_operations. No guidance on when not to use or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dipseth/google_workspace_fastmcp2'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server