get_product_prices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It doesn't explicitly state whether this is a read-only operation, any authentication requirements, or behavior when the product doesn't exist. The verb 'get' implies safety but this is not clearly disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that is front-loaded with the action and resource. Every word contributes meaning without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only one parameter and no output schema, the description explains what the tool does but doesn't describe the structure or format of the returned price levels. While adequate for a simple getter, it could mention that the response contains multiple levels with associated pricing details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes product_id as 'ID du produit' with 100% coverage. The description adds minimal context by mentioning 'd'un produit' but doesn't explain the parameter further. No additional constraints or relationships are added, making this baseline acceptable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves price levels for a product, specifying 'tous les niveaux tarifaires' (all price levels). This specific verb+resource+scope distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_product and set_product_price.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_product or get_thirdparty_price_level. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context about when this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.