bundle_ids_get_collection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it discloses nothing. It does not mention pagination, authentication scope, rate limits, or the fact that this is a read-only, non-mutating operation — the only hint (the 'GET' token) is already implied by the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The text is short but wastes its entire budget restating the HTTP path twice in parentheses. This is under-specification rather than conciseness — brevity achieved by omitting information, not by compressing it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 14-parameter collection endpoint with no output schema and no annotations, the description supplies none of the context an agent needs (what it returns, whether results are paginated, how filters combine). It is wholly inadequate for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all 14 parameters (sort, limit, include, filters, sparse fieldsets) are already documented in the schema with enums and value lists. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, which places it at the baseline for fully-covered schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is the endpoint string duplicated — 'GET /v1/bundleIds (GET /v1/bundleIds)' — which merely restates the tool name rather than stating in plain terms that it lists bundle ID resources. An agent can infer a collection read from the path, but there is no explanation of the resource or of how this differs from bundle_ids_get_instance or other collection tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool, when not to, or which sibling (bundle_ids_get_instance, bundle_ids_create_instance) to prefer. Nothing in the text indicates the tool retrieves a paginated/filterable list of bundle IDs versus a single one.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.