apps_pre_release_versions_get_to_many_related

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it discloses nothing: no pagination behavior despite a limit parameter, no filtering or sorting semantics, no return shape. It is a duplicated path string.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but the parenthetical simply repeats the preceding path verbatim, so the single sentence contains zero information beyond the name and wastes the one line available for front-loading useful context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and no explanatory text, an agent gets nothing about auth requirements, pagination, or how results relate to pre-release versions and builds. The definition is inadequate for even a simple read endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and all three parameters (id, limit, fields_preReleaseVersions) are documented in the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is a bare restatement of the tool name as an HTTP path: 'GET /v1/apps/{id}/preReleaseVersions'. It conveys the verb (GET) and resource (preReleaseVersions scoped to an app) only because the name already does, and it does not distinguish this operation from the sibling apps_pre_release_versions_get_to_many_relationship.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus alternatives such as apps_pre_release_versions_get_to_many_relationship, pre_release_versions_get_collection, or apps_builds_get_to_many_related. The user is left to infer everything from the name suffix.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.