beta_crash_logs_get_instance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It only echoes an HTTP GET path and discloses nothing about permissions, errors, read-only status, rate limits, or what data is returned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The text is short but wastes its only content by repeating the identical REST path inside parentheses. It is concise without being useful, and no meaningful information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema and no annotations, so the description needed to explain what a beta crash log instance contains and how retrieval behaves. Instead it merely restates the endpoint, leaving the agent without enough context to invoke it confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both the required id and the fields_betaCrashLogs selector are fully documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter meaning, which is acceptable at the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is essentially the REST path repeated verbatim, 'GET /v1/betaCrashLogs/{id} (GET /v1/betaCrashLogs/{id})'. It implies retrieving a beta crash log but never states in plain language what the resource is or what operation is performed, making it close to tautology.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool, when not to, or what sibling tools might be alternatives. An agent gets no help distinguishing this from the many other *_get_instance tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.