app_store_review_attachments_delete_instance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it says nothing about irreversibility, required permissions, side effects, or the fact that this is a destructive mutation. The single word DELETE is the only signal, which is already in the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but the content is a redundant duplicate of the same path string rather than a front-loaded statement of purpose. Brevity here reflects under-specification, not efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive delete tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should at minimum state that the attachment is permanently removed. Nothing beyond the raw route is provided, leaving the agent without the context needed to call it responsibly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and there is only one parameter, so the schema fully documents 'id' as the requested resource id. The description adds no format, provenance, or example beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The text is a bare restatement of the tool name and its HTTP route (DELETE /v1/appStoreReviewAttachments/{id}), duplicated verbatim in parentheses. It conveys that a resource is deleted but adds no scope, effect, or differentiation from sibling delete tools such as app_store_review_attachments_delete_instance's counterparts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use, prerequisites, or alternative guidance is given. There is no indication of what must exist first or what an agent should call instead when it wants to update or read the attachment.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.