app_event_localizations_delete_instance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it adds nothing: it does not state that this is an irreversible destructive operation, whether it cascades to related screenshots/video clips, what permissions are needed, or whether the response is empty or 204. A raw method+path string is insufficient for a delete tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but every character is wasted: the same method-and-path string is printed twice with no front-loaded statement of purpose. Brevity here reflects under-specification, not efficient conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive instance-deletion tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should convey irreversibility, side effects, and success semantics. It supplies none of these, leaving the agent without the context needed to invoke it safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single 'id' parameter, and the schema already documents it as 'the id of the requested resource'. Per the high-coverage baseline, 3 is appropriate since the description adds no meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is merely the HTTP verb plus the endpoint path, 'DELETE /v1/appEventLocalizations/{id}', duplicated verbatim in parentheses. It effectively restates the tool name rather than explaining what the resource is or what deleting it means, so it sits at the tautology level.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no mention of alternatives such as app_event_localizations_update_instance or app_event_localizations_get_instance, and no preconditions. Nothing routes the agent among sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.