app_store_version_release_requests_create_instance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses only the HTTP verb and that a JSON:API body is expected; it says nothing about side effects (this initiates an app release), required permissions, idempotency, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The path is repeated verbatim inside parentheses ('POST /v1/appStoreVersionReleaseRequests (POST /v1/appStoreVersionReleaseRequests)'), which is pure redundancy in a two-sentence description. It is short but not efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation endpoint with no annotations, no output schema, and an opaque body schema (additionalProperties: {}), the description omits what an agent most needs: what the call accomplishes, what it requires, and what happens as a result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and there is a single 'body' parameter, so the schema already documents it and the baseline is 3. The description's pointer to components.schemas.AppStoreVersionReleaseRequestCreateRequest duplicates what the schema already says and adds no new semantic detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is essentially a restatement of the tool name and path: 'POST /v1/appStoreVersionReleaseRequests'. It never explains in domain terms what a version release request does (e.g., request that an approved App Store version go live), so an agent gets no more than it could infer from the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of any alternative sibling (e.g., phased releases or submissions). The agent is left to infer everything from the endpoint path.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.