zabbix_sla_update_schedule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description offers no behavioral details: no mention of whether params override or merge, authentication requirements, or side effects. The description contributes zero transparency beyond the method name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is overly terse (one sentence) but sacrifices all meaningful content for brevity. It is not appropriately sized because it fails to convey essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (update operation, output schema exists), the description is woefully incomplete. It lacks any context about the domain (SLA schedules), return values, or usage patterns, making it nearly useless for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema defines a single 'params' object with no properties and 0% description coverage. The description adds no information about expected keys or structure, leaving the agent completely uninformed about what parameters to pass.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description merely restates the method name 'sla.update_schedule' without explaining its purpose (updating an SLA schedule). It does not clarify the resource or action, barely distinguishing it from siblings like create_schedule or delete_schedule.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description fails to mention that it updates existing schedules, nor does it exclude creation or deletion. Sibling tools exist but no comparison is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.