zabbix_event_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It merely repeats the method name without explaining side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or return structure. This is a critical gap for a tool that likely retrieves sensitive monitoring data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits essential details. Conciseness should not come at the cost of completeness; here, the description is under-specified, earning a low score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (likely many filter options in params) and the presence of many sibling tools, the description fails to provide sufficient context. It does not explain what events are, how to filter, or what the output contains, despite having an output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a single 'params' parameter with anyOf object/null and 0% coverage. The description adds no information about what keys or values the params object accepts, leaving the agent with no meaningful guidance for invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Zabbix API event.get method', which identifies the tool as a retrieval method for events. This provides a clear verb and resource, but it is terse and does not distinguish it from other get methods on the same server. A score of 3 indicates adequate clarity with room for improvement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus its siblings like zabbix_event_create or zabbix_event_get. The description does not mention context, prerequisites, or alternatives, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.