zabbix_connector_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description merely states it's a method. There is no disclosure of side effects, required authentication, rate limits, or what changes are made. For a mutation tool, this lacks necessary behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief (one sentence), but it is too minimal to be effective. It sacrifices clarity and completeness for brevity, which is not a good trade-off.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, 0% parameter coverage, and an output schema that is not described, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain the tool's purpose, behavior, or usage, leaving the agent with little actionable information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter 'params' with 0% schema description coverage. The description does not explain what 'params' should contain or how to structure it. It adds no value beyond the schema itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as updating a Zabbix connector, using the verb 'update' and resource 'connector'. It distinguishes from siblings like create/delete/get. However, it lacks explanation of what a connector is, so non-experts may not fully understand.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like zabbix_connector_create or zabbix_connector_get. There is no mention of prerequisites, typical use cases, or scenarios where this should be avoided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.