zabbix_sla_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description offers no behavioral details (e.g., read-only, permissions, side effects). It does not disclose what the tool does or any constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While the description is short, it is severely under-specified. It lacks necessary information and does not earn its place as it provides no value beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, many siblings, and a complex parameter, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to explain purpose, usage, or parameter semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'params' is an untyped object with zero schema description coverage. The description does not explain what fields the object should contain, leaving the agent without guidance for invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Zabbix API sla.get method' is vague and tautologically restates the method name. It does not specify what SLA data is retrieved or how it differs from sibling tools like zabbix_sla_get_schedule or zabbix_sla_get_sla.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool compared to alternatives. With many sibling SLA tools (e.g., zabbix_sla_get_schedule, zabbix_sla_get_sla), the description fails to explain the specific use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.