zabbix_module_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects (e.g., module created in Zabbix), permissions required, idempotency, or error behavior. The one-sentence description provides no transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) but lacks substance. Conciseness should not sacrifice informativeness; here the brevity undermines utility. The structure is front-loaded with minimal content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description is extremely incomplete. It does not explain the tool's functionality, input requirements, or how it fits among 100+ sibling tools. The agent is left without enough context to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a single freeform 'params' object with 0% description coverage. The description does not explain what keys or values the params object should contain. Without any guidance, the agent has no information to construct valid input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description merely restates the tool name as 'Zabbix API module.create method', which is a tautology. It does not specify what a Zabbix module is or how this creation differs from other create tools (e.g., zabbix_host_create). The agent cannot infer the tool's purpose beyond the API method name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions. The agent has no context to decide between this and sibling tools like zabbix_module_install or zabbix_module_create.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.