zabbix_correlation_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'delete', which implies destructive action, but lacks details on idempotency, error behavior, or required permissions. This is inadequate for a delete operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but overly brief. It fails to convey necessary information, making it under-specified rather than efficiently concise. Every sentence should add value, but this one adds little beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (it's a delete operation with a generic input schema and no output schema details), the description is severely incomplete. It lacks behavioral context, parameter usage, and any explanation of what the deletion entails. The agent cannot reliably use this tool based on the description alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one generic parameter 'params' with 0% schema description coverage. The description does not explain what parameters are needed, their format, or their purpose. The tool cannot be used correctly without additional parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it is a delete method for correlations, which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like zabbix_correlation_create or zabbix_correlation_get. However, it does not explain what a correlation is, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No prerequisites, context, or exclusions provided. The description simply names the API method without helping the agent decide when to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.