zabbix_hostgroup_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, and the description only names the API method. It does not disclose that the tool is read-only, idempotent, or which errors may occur (e.g., nonexistent hostgroup). Minimal behavioral insight.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one phrase), but it sacrifices necessary detail. It is front-loaded with the method name, but more context would improve usability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists, the description could focus on input configuration and behavior, but it fails to address common use cases, filtering, or pagination. Incomplete for a real-world Zabbix API tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'params' has no description in schema (0% coverage), and the description adds no explanation of its structure or typical usage. The agent receives no guidance on what to pass.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool's function as 'Zabbix API hostgroup.get method', which is a retrieval operation on hostgroup resources. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create, delete, update by using 'get'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like zabbix_hostgroup_exists or when to apply filters. The description does not mention context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.