update_note
Update fields on an existing Planhat note using its ID. Modify text or extra fields.
Instructions
Update fields on an existing Planhat note.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | No | ||
| note_id | Yes | ||
| extra_fields | No |
Update fields on an existing Planhat note using its ID. Modify text or extra fields.
Update fields on an existing Planhat note.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | No | ||
| note_id | Yes | ||
| extra_fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations provide idempotentHint and destructiveHint, but the description adds no additional behavioral context such as permissions, rate limits, or effects of missing fields.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, but it lacks necessary detail about parameters and usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a mutation tool with no output schema and no parameter descriptions, the description is severely incomplete, leaving the agent without essential guidance.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any parameters. The agent is left to infer meaning from parameter names alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (update) and resource (Planhat note), distinguishing it from create, delete, and get siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_note, delete_note, or other update tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/da-troll/planhat-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server