delete_company
Remove a company from Planhat by providing its unique company ID.
Instructions
Delete a Planhat company.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_id | Yes |
Remove a company from Planhat by providing its unique company ID.
Delete a Planhat company.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructive behavior. The description adds no additional context about side effects (e.g., cascading deletes, reversibility) beyond confirming the action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise and front-loaded. However, it is too minimal to fully convey necessary information beyond the basic purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a delete tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description lacks information about return values, error states, or behavioral nuances. It is incomplete given the annotations and simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description provides no information about the 'company_id' parameter. The tool name implies it is the company ID, but explicit guidance is missing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and resource ('Planhat company'). It differentiates from sibling delete tools by specifying the entity type, though it does not elaborate further.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., other delete tools or deactivation). No prerequisites or conditions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/da-troll/planhat-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server