delete_user
Remove a user from your Planhat instance by providing their user ID.
Instructions
Delete a Planhat user (team member).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes |
Remove a user from your Planhat instance by providing their user ID.
Delete a Planhat user (team member).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. Description adds 'team member' context but does not disclose irreversible effects or safety warnings, which would add value beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise single sentence with no wasted words. However, it is under-specified and could include more detail without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal completeness given the tool's complexity (single required param, destructive action). Does not mention permanence, restrictions, or response format. Barely meets minimum viability.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description does not explain what 'user_id' represents (e.g., unique ID, email). Fails to add meaning beyond the parameter name.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the action 'Delete' and resource 'a Planhat user (team member)'. Distinguishes from sibling tools for deleting other entities. However, lacks additional specificity like scope or effects.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like deactivating a user or deleting other entities. No prerequisites or context for appropriate use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/da-troll/planhat-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server