Verify Wallet Funding

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'verify', suggesting a non-destructive read operation, but does not explicitly state idempotency, safety, or potential side effects. With no annotations, the description carries full burden and provides minimal insight into behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, perfectly concise, front-loaded with key action and input. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool, it covers the basic action and input. However, missing output details (e.g., what verification returns) leaves some context gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter, and the description does not add meaning beyond the schema's 'Paystack payment reference'. Meets baseline but no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'verify', the resource 'wallet funding transaction', and the method 'by Paystack reference'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like neuron_fund_wallet, neuron_wallet_balance, and neuron_wallet_transactions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied (after funding via Paystack), but no explicit guidance on when to use vs. alternatives, no when-not or prerequisites mentioned. Lacks explicit directive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.