neuron_get_knowledge_baseRetrieve detailed information about a specific knowledge base by providing its unique identifier.
Retrieve detailed information about a specific knowledge base by its ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Unique identifier of the knowledge base |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, so the tool's safe, read-only behavior is well-documented. The description reinforces this by stating 'retrieve'. It does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, clear sentence that is front-loaded with the action and resource. No unnecessary words; every part adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description lacks details about the output schema or the set of fields returned. Without an output schema, the agent is left with vague 'detailed information'. For a simple read tool, this is minimally adequate but could be more specific.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There is only one parameter 'id' with 100% schema coverage. The description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema's 'Unique identifier of the knowledge base'. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Retrieve detailed information about a specific knowledge base by its ID.' clearly states the action (retrieve), the resource (knowledge base), and the scope (by ID). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'list_knowledge_bases' or 'create_knowledge_base'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving a single knowledge base by ID, but it does not explicitly specify when to use this over alternatives like 'list_knowledge_bases' for listing all knowledge bases. No exclusions or alternative tools are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.