Create Outbound Webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the core behavior: firing HTTP requests when specified events occur. It lists the event types, which is helpful. However, it does not mention potential side effects like retry logic, authentication requirements, or error handling. Given the openWorldHint annotation, the description partially compensates but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. The first clearly states the purpose. The second lists events, which is helpful for quick scanning but partially redundant with the schema. Slightly more compact phrasing could be used, but overall effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the moderate complexity (5 params, 4 required) and no output schema, the description covers the basic functionality and events. However, it lacks guidance on post-creation steps (e.g., verification, logging) and does not reference related tools like 'neuron_get_outbound_webhook_logs'. It is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so each parameter already has a description. The tool description does not add new semantic information for parameters beyond what is in the schema. The list of events in the description duplicates the enum values, providing no extra clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates an outbound webhook that fires HTTP requests on bot events. The verb 'create' and resource 'outbound webhook' are specific, and listing the event types distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'neuron_create_webhook' (presumably inbound).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for hooking into bot events, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'neuron_create_webhook' (inbound) or 'neuron_update_outbound_webhook'. No prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.