Create Webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations include openWorldHint=true, but the description does not add meaningful behavioral context beyond that. It fails to disclose what 'triggers bot actions' entails (e.g., callback URL creation, authentication needs, rate limits, or reversibility). For a creation tool, more transparency on side effects is expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. It efficiently communicates the tool's core function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters (2 required) and no output schema, the description is minimal. It does not explain what a webhook is in this context, the relationship to bot actions, or what the tool returns upon success. While straightforward, it could be more helpful for agents.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with all 6 parameters described in the schema. The description itself does not add any extra meaning about parameters, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new inbound webhook that triggers bot actions when called' clearly states the verb (create), resource (inbound webhook), and distinct purpose. It effectively differentiates from sibling tools like neuron_list_webhooks, neuron_delete_webhook, and neuron_create_outbound_webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating a new inbound webhook but provides no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives, such as when to create an outbound webhook instead. No prerequisites or contextual cues are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.