Update Webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates mutation ('update') but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, required permissions, or rate limits. The openWorldHint annotation suggests extensibility but is not explained. More detail on expected behavior beyond the schema is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, making it quick to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple update operation with a well-defined schema, the description is adequate but lacks context about webhook use cases or integration details. With no output schema, more context on expected return might help, but overall it's minimally sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 5 parameters are already described in the input schema with 100% coverage. The description does not add any additional meaning, relationships, or constraints beyond the schema. It meets the baseline but offers no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb 'Update' and resource 'existing webhook configuration', immediately conveying the action. It distinguishes from create or delete operations. However, it does not differentiate from potentially similar tools like neuron_update_outbound_webhook, leaving ambiguity about webhook type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as recreate or disable. No prerequisites, such as having the webhook ID, or conditions are mentioned. The agent is left to infer usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.