Start Channel Session

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions starting a session and generating a QR code, but does not disclose side effects (e.g., overwriting an active session), required channel state, or whether the QR code is returned immediately. This is a significant gap for a session-initiating action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with two sentences that front-load the core action and outcome. Every sentence serves a purpose, avoiding any filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the tool is simple with one parameter, the description lacks details about the output (e.g., QR code format, expiration) and the overall session lifecycle. Given no output schema, more context about the return value and subsequent steps would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides for the 'id' parameter. It merely restates the parameter's purpose without enhancing understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool starts a Baileys session and generates a QR code for pairing. It uses a specific verb ('Start') and resource ('Baileys session for the channel'), distinguishing it from related tools like neuron_get_channel_qr and neuron_stop_channel_session.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to initiate a WhatsApp session, but it does not provide explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives. It lacks mention of prerequisites, potential conflicts with existing sessions, or when to prefer this tool over other session-related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.