Toggle Built-in Tool

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the action itself. It does not discuss permissions, side effects, or consequences of toggling a tool. With only an openWorldHint annotation, the description could have provided more detail about what happens when tools are enabled/disabled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: a single sentence followed by example values. Every word is necessary and front-loaded, with no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the tool is simple, the description lacks information about return values, error conditions, or required permissions. Given that there is no output schema, the agent might need more context to handle failures or understand the effect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes each parameter with examples (e.g., toolId). The description's additional examples are redundant, adding no new semantic meaning. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Enable or disable a specific built-in tool for a bot'), which is a specific verb-resource combination. It also provides example tool IDs, making the purpose unambiguous and distinguishing it from sibling tools that perform other actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'neuron_bulk_toggle_builtin_tools' for multiple tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, limitations, or contextual cues for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.