get_followup_sequence

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and description only restates purpose without disclosing behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, side effects, authentication needs, rate limits).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single efficient sentence with no wasted words, clearly conveying the tool's purpose and scope.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple one-parameter tool: states purpose and enumerates types. Lacks explanation of return format (no output schema) but sufficient given low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage with enum descriptions; description adds no new meaning beyond 'different situations', which is already in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Get' and resource 'follow-up sequence', enumerates four specific situations in parentheses, distinguishing it from siblings like get_call_script or get_closing_script.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage when a follow-up sequence is needed for listed situations, but provides no explicit when-not or alternative tools like get_cold_email_template for cold outbound.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.