watson_delete_deployment
Deletes a Watson model deployment by specifying the deployment ID and space ID.
Instructions
Delete a model deployment
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| deployment_id | Yes | ||
| space_id | Yes | ||
| region | No |
Deletes a Watson model deployment by specifying the deployment ID and space ID.
Delete a model deployment
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| deployment_id | Yes | ||
| space_id | Yes | ||
| region | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits like irreversibility or side effects. It only states 'Delete' without any additional context on what happens to the deployment, required permissions, or potential impacts.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (one sentence), but it sacrifices necessary detail. For a delete operation, brevity is acceptable, but it should still be front-loaded with critical information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 3 parameters, is destructive, and has no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It lacks details on parameter roles, effects, and success criteria.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the three parameters (deployment_id, space_id, region). The agent gets no additional meaning beyond the schema types.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a model deployment' clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (model deployment), distinguishing it from sibling tools like watson_list_deployments or watson_deploy_model.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or conditions for deletion. The description is purely declarative.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmedselimmansor-ctrl/IBM_cloud_MCP_SERVER'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server