dl_list_gateways
Retrieve a list of all Direct Link gateways in your IBM Cloud account.
Instructions
List Direct Link gateways
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a list of all Direct Link gateways in your IBM Cloud account.
List Direct Link gateways
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'list' but does not mention pagination, ordering, filtering, or what happens when no gateways are found. This is insufficient for a robust tool definition.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence. It is appropriately concise for a no-parameter read operation, though it could be slightly more descriptive.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description should at least hint at the return format (e.g., list of gateway IDs/details). It does not, leaving the agent with incomplete context for interpreting the result.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has zero parameters, so no additional parameter info is needed. The baseline of 4 applies per scoring guidelines for 0-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('List') and the resource ('Direct Link gateways'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'tg_list_gateways' which lists Transit Gateways.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool, what prerequisites exist, or alternatives. The description does not help the agent decide between listing gateways here vs. other list operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmedselimmansor-ctrl/IBM_cloud_MCP_SERVER'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server