sm_get_secret
Retrieve the value of a secret from IBM Cloud Secrets Manager by specifying the instance and secret IDs.
Instructions
Get a secret's value
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| instance_id | Yes | ||
| secret_id | Yes | ||
| region | No |
Retrieve the value of a secret from IBM Cloud Secrets Manager by specifying the instance and secret IDs.
Get a secret's value
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| instance_id | Yes | ||
| secret_id | Yes | ||
| region | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description must inform behavior. It only states the action, omitting that secret retrieval may require permissions and may return sensitive data. No mention of idempotency or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but under-specified. Not concise in a helpful way; lacks structure like front-loading key usage details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 3 parameters, no output schema, no annotations, and many sibling tools, the description is severely incomplete. No info on return format, errors, or constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and description adds no parameter explanations. Instance_id, secret_id, and region are not defined; region's purpose is not clarified.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a secret's value' clearly identifies the action (get) and resource (secret's value), distinguishing it from sibling tools like sm_list_secrets which likely list metadata.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no prerequisites or scenarios mentioned. The description provides no usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmedselimmansor-ctrl/IBM_cloud_MCP_SERVER'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server