vpc_create_public_gateway
Creates a public gateway in a specified VPC and zone to enable internet connectivity for resources.
Instructions
Create a public gateway
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| vpc_id | Yes | ||
| zone | Yes | ||
| region | No |
Creates a public gateway in a specified VPC and zone to enable internet connectivity for resources.
Create a public gateway
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| vpc_id | Yes | ||
| zone | Yes | ||
| region | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or resource lifecycle. It only states the action without elaboration.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise but under-specified. It does not earn its place by providing helpful context beyond the tool name.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of creating a public gateway in a VPC and the absence of output schema or parameter descriptions, the description is severely incomplete. It lacks context about dependencies, such as the need for a VPC and subnet.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage and no parameter details in the description, the agent gains no insight into parameter meanings beyond names and types. The description fails to compensate for the lack of schema documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Create a public gateway' is a specific verb+resource phrase that clearly states the action. It distinguishes from sibling tools like vpc_create_vpn_gateway or tg_create_gateway, though it lacks explicit differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are there prerequisites or exclusions mentioned. The description offers no context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmedselimmansor-ctrl/IBM_cloud_MCP_SERVER'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server