db_create_backup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states the operation 'create', but does not disclose potential impacts (e.g., whether it is long-running, costs, or any temporary disruption). The agent gains little behavioral insight beyond the obvious mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. For a simple operation, it is appropriately sized and front-loaded, conveying the essential purpose immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 2 parameters and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what the backup is used for, how to interpret the response, or any limitation (e.g., region applicability). The agent lacks context for correct invocation and expected results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no information about the two parameters (deployment_id, region). Parameter names are somewhat intuitive, but the description fails to clarify their meaning, formatting, or constraints, leaving the agent reliant on guessing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create an on-demand backup' clearly identifies the action (create) and resource (backup), and distinguishes from siblings like db_list_backups and db_restore_backup. It is specific but lacks any further detail about the backup purpose or scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like db_list_backups or db_restore_backup. Prerequisites (e.g., deployment must exist) are not mentioned, and there is no indication of appropriate contexts.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.