ks_delete_cluster
Deletes a Kubernetes cluster from IBM Cloud by providing the cluster ID and optional resource group.
Instructions
Delete a Kubernetes cluster
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cluster | Yes | ||
| resource_group_id | No |
Deletes a Kubernetes cluster from IBM Cloud by providing the cluster ID and optional resource group.
Delete a Kubernetes cluster
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cluster | Yes | ||
| resource_group_id | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as irreversibility, required permissions, or cascading effects on associated resources. For a destructive operation, this is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words, achieving high efficiency. However, it may be too minimal for a deletion tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and minimal parameter info, the description fails to provide necessary context such as return values, side effects, or confirmation steps. The tool is under-described.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not add any meaning to the parameter names. Although 'cluster' and 'resource_group_id' are somewhat self-explanatory, the description does not elaborate on their expected format or values.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a Kubernetes cluster' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from siblings like ks_create_cluster, ks_get_cluster, and ks_list_clusters.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The description lacks usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmedselimmansor-ctrl/IBM_cloud_MCP_SERVER'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server