schematics_delete_workspace
Delete a Schematics workspace and optionally destroy its resources.
Instructions
Delete a Schematics workspace
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | ||
| destroy_resources | No |
Delete a Schematics workspace and optionally destroy its resources.
Delete a Schematics workspace
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | ||
| destroy_resources | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as irreversibility, permission requirements, or the effect of the destroy_resources parameter. It is too brief to be transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise but borderline under-specified. It could include additional context without being overly long.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and two parameters, the description is incomplete. It lacks essential details about deletion behavior, resource impact, and parameter effects, making it inadequate for an agent to use safely.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description adds no meaning for either parameter. It does not explain workspace_id or the boolean destroy_resources, leaving the agent without context to set correct values.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a Schematics workspace' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing the tool from siblings like schematics_create_workspace or schematics_get_workspace.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites, consequences, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmedselimmansor-ctrl/IBM_cloud_MCP_SERVER'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server