get_document_versions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full load. It details return structure (past, current, future versions) but does not explicitly confirm read-only behavior or mention side effects, permissions, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the main action and well-structured with param and returns sections. However, it is slightly verbose due to docstring formatting which could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool (1 param, returns version series details) and the presence of an output schema, the description covers purpose, parameter, and return structure adequately. Missing error conditions or prerequisites but still fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage for the 'identifier' parameter, but the description compensates by specifying that it can be a document ID (GUID) or path, adding significant meaning beyond just 'string'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the purpose: 'Retrieves all versions in the version series that includes the specified document.' It specifies the resource (versions in a series) and distinguishes from siblings like delete_document_version.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for fetching version history but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like delete_document_version. No guidance on prerequisites or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.