Skip to main content
Glama

Update Ip_range

netbox_update_ip_range
DestructiveIdempotent

Update an IP range in NetBox by providing its ID and only the fields to change. Unspecified fields remain unchanged.

Instructions

Update an existing ip_range in NetBox (PATCH semantics — only provided fields are changed).

Supply the numeric 'id' and only the fields you want to change. Omitting a field leaves it unchanged.

Returns: Markdown summary of the updated object (default) or JSON with the full NetBox response.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesNumeric id of the ip_range to update.
vrfNo
roleNo
tagsNoOptional array of tag slugs to apply to the object.
statusNo
tenantNo
commentsNo
descriptionNo
end_addressNo
custom_fieldsNoOptional object of custom-field slugs -> values. Only include fields defined on your NetBox instance.
mark_utilizedNo
start_addressNo
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' (default, human-readable) or 'json' (full structured payload). Use 'json' when chaining follow-up tool calls.markdown
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. Description adds context on PATCH semantics and partial change behavior, but doesn't significantly extend beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three focused sentences with front-loaded purpose and minimal redundancy. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers the core update semantics and response format choices. For a 13-parameter tool without output schema, it is fairly complete but could detail more optional parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is low (31%), so the description must compensate. It mentions 'id' and 'response_format' explicitly, but doesn't explain other parameters like vrf, role, tags, etc. Marginal added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update an existing ip_range') and the resource, and explicitly mentions PATCH semantics, which distinguishes it from create, get, delete, and list tools in the sibling list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit instructions to supply numeric 'id' and only fields to change, with clear omission behavior. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives but effectively guides partial updates.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ZenixSolutions/netbox-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server