Skip to main content
Glama

List Provider_networks

netbox_list_provider_networks
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search and browse provider networks in NetBox using pagination, text search, and specific filters by name or provider ID.

Instructions

List provider networks from NetBox.

Supports pagination and filtering. Common patterns:

  • Discovery: call with no filters to browse the first provider_networks.

  • Lookup by id: use netbox_get_provider_network instead when you already have an id.

  • Narrow scan: combine 'q' (fuzzy text) with resource-specific filters below.

Pagination:

  • 'limit' (max 1000, default 50) and 'offset'. Response includes 'has_more' and 'next_offset'.

  • Large list responses auto-truncate to keep under the character limit; keep calling with next_offset to continue.

Resource-specific filters:

  • provider_id:

  • name:

Universal filters:

  • q (string) Fuzzy text search across searchable fields.

  • tag (string[]) AND-filter by tag slugs.

  • created_after (date) ISO-8601 lower bound on 'created'.

  • created_before (date) ISO-8601 upper bound on 'created'.

Returns: Markdown summary (default) or JSON with shape: { total, count, offset, limit, items: [...], has_more, next_offset? }

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoFuzzy full-text search across the object's searchable fields (name, description, etc.).
tagNoFilter to objects that have ALL of these tag slugs. Repeat for multiple tags (AND semantics in NetBox).
nameNo
limitNoMaximum number of items to return per page (1-1000, default 50).
offsetNoNumber of items to skip for pagination. Use next_offset from a previous response.
provider_idNo
created_afterNoISO-8601 date; only return objects created on or after this date (e.g. 2024-01-01).
created_beforeNoISO-8601 date; only return objects created on or before this date.
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' (default, human-readable) or 'json' (full structured payload). Use 'json' when chaining follow-up tool calls.markdown
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. Description adds critical behavioral details: pagination with auto-truncation, response shape with has_more and next_offset, and support for both markdown and JSON output. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-organized with clear sections (purpose, patterns, pagination, filters, returns). Bullet points and concise sentences. Every sentence adds information; no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a list tool with 9 parameters and no output schema, the description covers all necessary aspects: common patterns, pagination behavior, filter categories, and return format. Annotations provide safety and idempotency hints. No gaps identified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 78%. Description groups filters into resource-specific (provider_id, name) and universal (q, tag, created_after, created_before), adding structure. Lists pagination params and response_format. Falls short on explaining provider_id and name beyond listing them, but overall adds value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List provider networks from NetBox' (specific verb+resource). It distinguishes from sibling tool netbox_get_provider_network for single item lookup, and from create/update/delete tools in the sibling list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit common usage patterns (discovery, lookup by id with alternative tool, narrow scan with filters). Explains pagination and response format. Could mention when not to use this tool (e.g., if you need a single item, use get), but it does say that indirectly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ZenixSolutions/netbox-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server