Create Interface_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate it's a write operation (readOnlyHint=false). The description adds that it 'adds a new row' and cautions about dry-run, but does not disclose any side effects, required permissions, or limitations. The behavioral disclosure is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short with only three sentences and a returns section, avoiding verbosity. However, the dry-run instruction feels placed awkwardly, and the structure could be improved by separating usage notes from return format.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 12 parameters, no output schema, and no explanation of what interface templates are or how they relate to device types, the description is incomplete. An agent would struggle to understand how to correctly use all optional fields like bridge, poe_mode, etc.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 42%, and the tool description adds no explanation of parameters beyond what the schema provides. Critical relationships (e.g., mutual exclusivity of device_type and module_type) are not clarified. The description fails to compensate for the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a new interface_template in NetBox. However, it does not distinguish this from sibling tools like netbox_update_interface_template or netbox_create_interface, which also deal with interface templates or interfaces.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a safety caution about asking before calling if the user wants a dry-run, but it provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., netbox_get_interface_template for reading, netbox_update_interface_template for modifying). No prerequisites or context are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.