Skip to main content
Glama

List Rear_port_templates

netbox_list_rear_port_templates
Read-onlyIdempotent

List rear port templates from NetBox. Filter by device type or name, use fuzzy text search, and paginate through results.

Instructions

List rear port templates from NetBox.

Supports pagination and filtering. Common patterns:

  • Discovery: call with no filters to browse the first rear_port_templates.

  • Lookup by id: use netbox_get_rear_port_template instead when you already have an id.

  • Narrow scan: combine 'q' (fuzzy text) with resource-specific filters below.

Pagination:

  • 'limit' (max 1000, default 50) and 'offset'. Response includes 'has_more' and 'next_offset'.

  • Large list responses auto-truncate to keep under the character limit; keep calling with next_offset to continue.

Resource-specific filters:

  • device_type_id:

  • name:

  • name__ic:

Universal filters:

  • q (string) Fuzzy text search across searchable fields.

  • tag (string[]) AND-filter by tag slugs.

  • created_after (date) ISO-8601 lower bound on 'created'.

  • created_before (date) ISO-8601 upper bound on 'created'.

Returns: Markdown summary (default) or JSON with shape: { total, count, offset, limit, items: [...], has_more, next_offset? }

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoFuzzy full-text search across the object's searchable fields (name, description, etc.).
tagNoFilter to objects that have ALL of these tag slugs. Repeat for multiple tags (AND semantics in NetBox).
nameNo
limitNoMaximum number of items to return per page (1-1000, default 50).
offsetNoNumber of items to skip for pagination. Use next_offset from a previous response.
name__icNo
created_afterNoISO-8601 date; only return objects created on or after this date (e.g. 2024-01-01).
created_beforeNoISO-8601 date; only return objects created on or before this date.
device_type_idNo
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' (default, human-readable) or 'json' (full structured payload). Use 'json' when chaining follow-up tool calls.markdown
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds pagination details (limit, offset, auto-truncation) and output format options, providing useful behavioral context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with sections for common patterns, pagination, filters, and return format. Mostly concise but the pagination section is slightly verbose. Front-loaded with purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 10 parameters and no output schema, the description covers pagination, common patterns, and filters reasonably well. However, the missing parameter descriptions leave some gaps, and the complexity warrants more detail on filters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 70% schema coverage, the description should compensate for undocumented parameters. It lists resource-specific filters by name but provides no descriptions for them (device_type_id, name, name__ic). The schema already documents most parameters, but these three lack description in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List rear port templates from NetBox' and provides common patterns like discovery and lookup by id, distinguishing from the sibling netbox_get_rear_port_template.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Describes when to use this tool (listing, browsing, filtering) and explicitly advises using netbox_get_rear_port_template when you already have an id. However, it does not cover other exclusions or alternatives beyond id lookup.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ZenixSolutions/netbox-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server