Update Circuit_group_assignment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate write behavior and destructiveness; description adds PATCH semantics, partial update behavior, and return format options (Markdown or JSON). No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short paragraphs plus return section, front-loaded with purpose and behavior, no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Explains PATCH behavior and return format, but lacks explanation of optional parameters (group, priority, member_id, member_type). With no output schema, a summary of expected fields would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 43%; description explains overall usage but does not describe parameters like group, priority, member_id, member_type beyond what schema provides. Fails to compensate for low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and the resource ('circuit_group_assignment'), and specifies PATCH semantics, distinguishing it from create, get, list, and delete siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear instructions to supply the numeric 'id' and only fields to change, with omitting fields leaving them unchanged. Does not explicitly mention when not to use or alternatives, but context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.