gorelo_get_time_entry

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so safety is covered; the description adds nothing beyond that — no mention of what happens with an invalid or missing id, whether archived/deleted entries are returned, or any permission scoping. For a trivial getter this is tolerable but still a gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler; every word contributes to identifying the operation and its scope.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a one-parameter getter with readOnlyHint and a fully documented schema, the description is close to sufficient, but with no output schema it never indicates what the returned entry contains or how a not-found case behaves.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter and schema coverage is 100%, with the schema itself describing it as 'Time entry to read.' The description's 'by id' adds no syntax, format, or sourcing detail beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Gets') and resource ('a single time entry by id'), so an agent can tell it fetches one record rather than a collection. It doesn't explicitly name gorelo_list_time_entries or gorelo_update_time_entry as the alternatives, but 'single ... by id' implicitly separates it from the list sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use statement, no prerequisites, and no alternatives named. An agent must infer that this is the tool to call when it already holds a time entry id and wants the full record rather than a list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.