gorelo-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gorelo-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze IT support tickets, categorize urgency, suggest responses, and retrieve statistics via MCP tools.-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides read-only visibility into CyberQP privileged access management data, including customer and account metadata, tenant event logs, and Just-In-Time account status and policies, for AI assistants.10-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with direct access to Autotask PSA for MSP operations. Enables natural language interaction for ticket management, time logging, company lookups, project tracking, and billing review through 39 comprehensive tools.10034 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query internal business data for insights into customers, revenue, subscriptions, sales, and churn through controlled, read-only MCP tools.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access Xentral ERP data — articles, customers, sales orders, invoices, and stock levels — through read-only MCP tools.AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only access to company data across PostgreSQL, MongoDB Atlas, and flat files through MCP tools, allowing AI assistants to query and retrieve information via natural language.-
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: tickets, comments, conversations, approvals, clients, contacts, contracts, assets, time entries, users, and configuration lists. The list-versus-get pattern is clearly separated, and even related pairs like conversations/comments and assets/custom-assets are distinguishable by their descriptions.
All tools share the gorelo_ prefix and follow a consistent verb_noun convention: list_<resource> for collections and get_<resource> for single entities. Config lists use the same list_<resource> pattern, making the entire tool set predictable.
At 24 tools, the server sits at the heavy end of the typical range. Each tool is straightforward and purposeful, but the overall surface feels large and is made up almost entirely of list/get read operations that could be seen as repetitive.
Read coverage is broad across the main GoRelo entities, but the surface is entirely read-only. There is no ticket update, comment creation, or log-time action, even though billing roles and work types reference logging time, which creates notable workflow gaps for agents that need to act on the data.