save_workbook
Write all in-memory changes in an open Excel workbook back to its file on disk to prevent data loss.
Instructions
Write the workbook's in-memory changes to its file on disk.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Write all in-memory changes in an open Excel workbook back to its file on disk to prevent data loss.
Write the workbook's in-memory changes to its file on disk.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It correctly identifies the tool as a write/persist operation. However, it lacks details on side effects (e.g., overwriting file, failure conditions) or whether the workbook remains open after save.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, immediately conveys the core action. Ideal length for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a basic save operation, but missing information about overwriting behavior, return value (if any), and interactions with other tools like 'close_workbook'. Given no output schema, the description should clarify what the agent can expect after calling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the 'session_id' parameter at all. The agent gets no help understanding what value to provide or how to obtain it, significantly hindering correct invocation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action 'write', the resource 'workbook's in-memory changes', and the destination 'its file on disk'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling like 'save_workbook_as' which saves to a different location.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'save_workbook_as' or 'close_workbook'. The description implies saving unsaved changes but does not explicitly state prerequisites or typical usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ShubhamDbug/Excel-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server